Question #1: Is the internet the only thing responsible for altering reading habits?
Question #2: Are numerous advertisements to blame for less interest in modern media?
Question #3: How is “systematizing everything” more effective?
There’s no doubt about it, the internet has become a part of daily life and can even be considered a modern necessity in order to stay connected to the rest of the world. Personally, I don’t think that the internet is solely responsible for altering the way people read. One of Carrs’ claims that I disagree with is: “I feel as if I’m always dragging my wayward brain back to the text. The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle.” (Carr 1) Later in the article he mentions that his lack of patience towards reading is caused by the internet. The way consumers read written materials such as: books, magazines and/or newspapers have drastically changed. Many publishers of printed media had to alter their business models just to keep their doors open. With that being said, there has also been a change in how consumers have been reading. There are numerous advantages involved with printed media such as: no batteries to charge, no loading times and most importantly, it doesn’t cause eyestrain as fast as a modern LCD screen. There are also disadvantages to printed media such as: environmentally unfriendly, not as portable and usually heavier than their electronic counterparts. Mobile computing devices such as laptops, tablets and smartphones have revolutionized the way consumers read by providing nearly instant access to huge databases of content. They can also be blamed for making reading faster paced and less immersive than their printed counterparts. Personally, I have trouble staring at an LCD screen no matter what device it is on for any longer than a couple hours at a time before my eyes feel like they are burning or before I start developing back pain and stiffness. I know many other people who experience similar problems and many good examples of this could also be found on the internet. Basically, I think that modern electronic devices with LCD screens have compromised the ability of many to read for longer periods of time, not the internet. It only makes sense to read faster in order to avoid the occasional eyestrain and back pain.
Question #2: Are numerous advertisements to blame for less interest in modern media?
Question #3: How is “systematizing everything” more effective?
There’s no doubt about it, the internet has become a part of daily life and can even be considered a modern necessity in order to stay connected to the rest of the world. Personally, I don’t think that the internet is solely responsible for altering the way people read. One of Carrs’ claims that I disagree with is: “I feel as if I’m always dragging my wayward brain back to the text. The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle.” (Carr 1) Later in the article he mentions that his lack of patience towards reading is caused by the internet. The way consumers read written materials such as: books, magazines and/or newspapers have drastically changed. Many publishers of printed media had to alter their business models just to keep their doors open. With that being said, there has also been a change in how consumers have been reading. There are numerous advantages involved with printed media such as: no batteries to charge, no loading times and most importantly, it doesn’t cause eyestrain as fast as a modern LCD screen. There are also disadvantages to printed media such as: environmentally unfriendly, not as portable and usually heavier than their electronic counterparts. Mobile computing devices such as laptops, tablets and smartphones have revolutionized the way consumers read by providing nearly instant access to huge databases of content. They can also be blamed for making reading faster paced and less immersive than their printed counterparts. Personally, I have trouble staring at an LCD screen no matter what device it is on for any longer than a couple hours at a time before my eyes feel like they are burning or before I start developing back pain and stiffness. I know many other people who experience similar problems and many good examples of this could also be found on the internet. Basically, I think that modern electronic devices with LCD screens have compromised the ability of many to read for longer periods of time, not the internet. It only makes sense to read faster in order to avoid the occasional eyestrain and back pain.
I havent thought about the screen being a problem as being a factor that causes people to read for for shorter periods of time, that a good reason. I agree with you about it affecting your eyesight, because I have to lower the brightness on all of my devices so I wouldnt strain my eyes as much. I started adjusting my devices after I started using my glasses but even then it hurts faster if I dont lower the brighhtness. People could avoid the strained eyes, if they get the retina displays but even then it cost money and it can also be a disadvantage to the people who cant afford it.
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with your statement regarding stereotypes and cultural stigmas affecting the way people judge groups rather than the individual responsible. In today's society, people tend to judge others based on their cultural background rather than their individuality. So many people may say it is wrong to judge other people based on their race, but they tend to do it as well. People tend to always notice someone's race or sexuality instantly, and then use that as an excuse to judge them. Like you said, it was two neighbors getting into a fight, but one happened to be homosexual. I am very happy that people are taking a stand for gay marriage and really trying to open people's eyes about it because everyone deserves to be happy with the one they love. People should not be judged on their sexuality or their race. I strongly agree with your last sentence, that everyone should try to avoid anger and hateful thoughts towards others!
ReplyDelete